The UX Research Coach Scam: When Failure Became a Business Model

🔥 LAST CHANCE! DOORS CLOSING TONIGHT! 🔥
"UX Research Career Accelerator 2025"

✨ Transform your career in just 8 weeks!
✨ Learn my PROVEN 5-step system to land your dream research role!
✨ Get EXCLUSIVE access to my proprietary interview frameworks!

BONUSES:
🎁 Resume template that got me 37 interviews!
🎁 Swipe-ready research proposals that WOW stakeholders!
🎁 Private Slack community ($997 value - FREE!)

💰 SPECIAL OFFER: $1997 $797 TODAY ONLY!

"I went from zero interviews to 3 job offers in 6 weeks!" - Sarah K.

⚠️ Only 3 spots left! ⏰ Timer ends in 11:59:32 ⚠️

There's a new career path in tech no one talks about: fail at UX research, rebrand as a UX research coach.

You've seen them on LinkedIn. No case studies. No research findings. No experience working with PMs, designers, or execs. But somehow, they're selling "UX Research career transformation" packages for $497 and running weekly Zoom pep rallies about "getting into UX research without a degree."

Let's be clear: this is a scam. Not always malicious. Not always deliberate. But a scam nonetheless. A system where the least qualified teach the most desperate. Where people who couldn't get hired become mentors to those who still believe the system works.

This is the UX Research Coach Industrial Complex—and it's thriving on broken promises.

The Grift Is Simple

Here's how it usually goes:

• Someone goes through a bootcamp, doesn't land a job.
• They post motivational content about the "struggle."
• They build a small audience of equally desperate folks.
• They offer "clarity calls," interview templates, and generic career advice.
• Suddenly, they're a "coach." Not because they've succeeded—because they couldn't.

And let's be real: it's easier to sell the dream of UX research than it is to do the actual job. Coaching is safer than facing rejection. It's cleaner than working in a messy product org. It pays better than waiting tables. And all you need is Canva and a sob story.

The Making of a UX Research "Coach"

The metamorphosis happens almost overnight. One day they're posting about their 47th rejection email, the next they're offering a "Job-Ready UX Research Portfolio Masterclass." The transformation isn't based on finally breaking into the industry—it's based on realizing there's money to be made in the desperation of others.

These coaches follow a predictable playbook:

1. The Pivot: "After 6 months of job hunting with no success, I realized my true calling was helping others." Translation: "I couldn't get hired, so I'm monetizing my failure."
2. The Package: They create digital products with names like "UX Research Career Launchpad" or "Research Confidence Blueprint"—vague enough to promise everything while delivering nothing substantive.
3. The Proof: Their "success stories" are often just screenshots of DMs saying "thank you for the motivation!" Not actual job offers. Not completed research studies. Just... gratitude for hope.
4. The Positioning: They position themselves as "anti-establishment" while simultaneously promising to help you join that same establishment. "The hiring system is broken! Also, pay me $300 to help you navigate it."

The most telling sign: these coaches rarely have their own case studies to share. Their "expertise" is entirely theoretical—based on what they've read, not what they've done. They can tell you about cognitive biases, but they've never had to explain to a CEO why those biases matter when revenue is on the line.

They Sell You Confidence, Not Competence

These coaches can't talk about methodology tradeoffs, because they've never had to defend a research plan. They can't help with stakeholder pushback, because they've never presented findings to one. They can't teach you to survive a research pivot, because they've never been in the room.

So they teach you vibes. They say things like "you are your portfolio" and "trust the process." They sell aesthetics. Mindsets. Carousel posts. But ask them to explain their sampling strategy in front of a hiring manager and the whole thing collapses like a discussion guide with leading questions.

What they're really selling is emotional comfort—the feeling that someone cares about your career journey. And look, there's value in that. But there's a world of difference between emotional support and professional development. One helps you feel better; the other helps you get better.

The problem is that many aspiring researchers don't know how to tell the difference. When you're desperate for a foothold in the industry, a coach who promises "I'll help you stand out from the competition" sounds like salvation—even if that coach couldn't stand out themselves.

The Red Flags You're Following a Faux Expert

Want to spot these coaches before they drain your bank account? Look for these warning signs:

• Their LinkedIn activity started exactly when the tech layoffs did. Suddenly, they're a "thought leader" after three years of radio silence.
• Their advice never gets technical. They talk about "storytelling" and "confidence" but never about how to handle research synthesis or methodological limitations.
• They have more content about finding jobs than doing the job. No posts about research methodologies, sampling strategies, or analysis frameworks—just endless content about "landing your dream role."
• Their own portfolio is mysteriously absent or filled with hypothetical research. Where's the evidence they've actually conducted impactful studies?
• They offer one-size-fits-all templates. UX research is contextual by nature. If they're selling the same approach to everyone, they've missed the fundamental principle of our profession.
• They're suspiciously active during business hours. Real UX researchers are in sessions, analyzing data, or drowning in Slack. If someone's posting motivational content at 11am on a Tuesday, ask yourself: what company is paying them to do this?
• They use the language of hustle culture and self-help. UX research isn't about "manifesting your best insights"—it's about rigorous methodology, ethical data collection, and evidence-based recommendations.

The most insidious part? These coaches often genuinely believe they're helping. They've convinced themselves that their struggles qualify them to guide others—a dangerous form of self-delusion that unfortunately sells well on social media.

What's happening beneath the surface is profoundly tragic: "If I can't make it, maybe I can feel important helping others pretend they will." It's an emotional pyramid scheme where everyone gets paid in false hope. The coaches get to rebrand their rejection as "choosing a different path," while creating an alternate reality where their failure becomes expertise. They're not just selling templates—they're selling themselves a comforting fiction where they never really failed at all. And that self-deception is what makes them so convincingly sincere when they promise you results they couldn't achieve themselves.

It's Not Just Harmless Hope

This isn't just "to each their own." This grift has a cost. It floods the field with bad advice. It wastes the time, money, and emotional energy of people trying to break into the field. And it poisons the perception of mentorship—because when everything's for sale, nothing feels genuine.

But the damage goes deeper than wasted resources. These coaches create a parallel reality where UX research success is about presentation over insights, confidence over competence, and personal branding over actual problem-solving. They're teaching people to look like researchers rather than think like researchers.

The result? We're seeing a generation of aspiring UXers who:

• Can create gorgeous slide decks but can't explain their methodological choices
• Spend more time on their portfolio's visual design than on the research findings inside it
• Have memorized research terminology but struggle to apply appropriate methods to novel research questions
• Focus on job titles over skill development
• Think UX research is about aesthetics rather than uncovering meaningful insights

This misalignment creates a brutal cycle: these junior researchers struggle in interviews because they've been prepared for an industry that doesn't exist, then turn back to the same coaches who failed them, hoping that just one more course or template will be the breakthrough.

Meanwhile, actual UX research professionals grow increasingly frustrated by candidates who look good on paper but lack fundamental skills—making them even less likely to hire juniors, which makes juniors even more desperate, which makes them even more susceptible to coaching scams.

The Economics of Exploitation

Let's talk about the financial equation that makes this possible. A typical UX research coach charges:

• $50-100 for a "portfolio review" that takes them 30 minutes
• $200-500 for a "coaching package" that's mostly templated content
• $1,000+ for "guaranteed job placement" programs with carefully worded refund policies

Compare this to what they'd make as junior UX researchers (if they could get hired): $70-100k annually in most markets. Now consider that they can onboard 5-10 coaching clients a month with the right social media strategy.

The math makes sense. Why work for a tech company when you can earn the same amount selling the promise of working at a tech company?

This creates a troubling incentive structure where failure becomes more profitable than success. Why struggle through the actual job market when you can monetize your rejection stories? Why build a real research portfolio when you can sell portfolio templates?

For the truly cynical coaches, there's an even darker calculation: successful clients leave, but struggling clients keep paying. Some coaches unconsciously design their programs to create dependency rather than independence—selling just enough hope to keep you coming back, but never enough substance to help you move on.

What Real Support Looks Like

• Portfolio reviews by people who've actually hired
• Case study critiques that focus on methodology, not presentations
• Mentorship from folks who've done the job, not just posted about it
• Transparency about what it takes to survive in this field—especially now

That's what juniors need. Not LinkedIn lives. Not mood boards. Not $300 e-books.

Real support isn't sexy. It's not packaged in a five-module course with bonus worksheets. It's messy, contextual, and often challenging. It looks like:

• A senior researcher taking 30 minutes to explain why your methodology might introduce bias
• A mentor asking hard questions about your sampling strategy
• A portfolio critique that focuses less on your slide design and more on your research process
• Honest conversations about industry expectations and market realities

Real mentorship is rarely monetized because the people qualified to give it are busy doing the work. They might offer an occasional coffee chat or portfolio review, but they're not building email funnels or creating landing pages for their "UX Research Mastery System."

The Path Forward

For the industry to heal from this parasitic coaching ecosystem, we need action on multiple fronts:

For UX Leaders and Hiring Managers:

Be more transparent about what you actually look for in candidates. The information vacuum creates the perfect environment for scammers to fill with misinformation. If juniors knew what really matters in interviews, they'd be less susceptible to quick fixes and magic bullets.

Create accessible entry points. The coaching industrial complex thrives on the perception that UX research is impossible to break into. Prove them wrong by creating internships, apprenticeships, and junior roles with realistic expectations.

For Senior UX Research Professionals:

Your silence is enabling this system. Share your knowledge freely when you can. Offer an hour a month. Review a portfolio. Host a methods teardown. Give a damn. Because if we don't step up, the scammers already have.

Let's be honest: plenty of real mentors exist. You just won't find them funneling you into Calendly links from a post about "imposter syndrome." They're in your Slack channels, your meetups, your group DMs—too busy doing the work to sell it. To these genuine mentors already quietly helping others: thank you. To everyone else: consider it professional maintenance—every bad coach creates dozens of poorly prepared juniors who make your hiring process harder. By investing in genuine mentorship now, you're making your own professional life easier later.

For Aspiring UX Researchers:

Ask hard questions before paying anyone for UX research career advice. What studies have they conducted? What companies have hired them? Can they connect you with successful students who now have full-time UX research roles?

Seek out community over commerce. There are wonderful, free UX research communities full of professionals willing to share advice. Start there before opening your wallet.

Value substance over style. The most compelling coach isn't the one with the prettiest Instagram; it's the one who can show you how they've solved actual research problems.

For the Tech Community:

Call this out when you see it. The coaching industrial complex thrives in shadows and silence. Name it. Discuss it. Make it harder for people to exploit others' career aspirations.

Elevate genuine mentors. Create recognition systems that highlight professionals who give back to the community without monetizing every interaction.

A Call for Real Mentorship

This isn't just about calling out bad actors. It's about reclaiming mentorship as a cornerstone of our professional community.

True mentorship isn't transactional—it's transformational. It's not about selling templates; it's about sharing context. It's not about guaranteeing outcomes; it's about guiding processes. It's not about making juniors dependent on you; it's about making them capable without you.

The most valuable guidance I've received in my career came from people who never charged me a cent—but who invested time, attention, and honest feedback because they cared about the craft and its future practitioners.

That's the tradition we need to rebuild. Not as a product to be sold, but as a practice to be shared.

To Those Feeling Stuck

And to the juniors stuck in the fog: If someone's selling you UX research success like a get-rich-quick scheme, they're not your mentor. They're your mark.

Look for guides who talk about the complexity, not just the opportunity. Who share their failures alongside their successes. Who teach methodology over platitudes.

The path into UX research isn't through a $497 course taught by someone who couldn't make it themselves. It's through consistent learning, genuine connection, and honest work—guided by those who've actually walked the road you're trying to travel.

Real mentors don't just sell you directions to your destination. They've been there themselves.

The next time someone offers to coach you into UX research, ask them to show their work. If all they’ve got is a Canva quote and a checkout link—run.

🎯 Still think you can shortcut your way into UX research?

I write one to three longform UX essays a week—part industry critique, part survival guide, part method-nerd catharsis.

👉 Subscribe now if you’d rather learn UX research from people who do the work, not just sell the dream.